@Meaningness Thoughts on why/how identity politics lost its stage 4 potential? That which can be destroyed by pseudo-pomo should be?
-
-
-
@othercriteria Yeah, I plan to write about that, but the short version is that intersectionalism rendered it incoherent. - 10 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@themattsimpson No, it’s just that it adopts the modal understanding of what causality is. That model doesn’t work in general, but can be >
-
@themattsimpson > pragmatically adequate. It’s just that you have to already have decided what the *possible few* causal factors are, and >
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@themattsimpson I don’t know the details of that theory, but it seems like it may be fine if its scope is properly understood!
-
@themattsimpson When we last discussed it, you hadn’t grokked it yet. Have you done so since? It’s been on my queue for decades.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@Meaningness interesting example for you. A lot of racial conflict in modern South Africa is 3/4 misunderstandings. Framework helped a lot. -
@grahamsrowe Thanks! can you say more about what “framework” means in this context? - 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@themattsimpson Yes, that’s very good. But then the next step, asking “is this model actually any good AT ALL,” seems to be avoided always.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@themattsimpson Oh, yes, it was probably
@Noahpinion not CowenThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
“A bridge to meta-rationality vs. civilizational collapse.”