@themattsimpson I think I find econ attractive for exactly that reason, but the field as it actually exists is a disaster… afaict
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.@themattsimpson I think this is right, and a strong argument for in-depth study of different disciplines with disparate textures.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@themattsimpson Which bits would you recommend?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@themattsimpson Yeeeehs… although no macro model seems to have significant predictive value (right?), and yet macro is still taught.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@themattsimpson Well, that doesn’t seem like a hugely strong recommendation :-)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@themattsimpson Yes, that’s very good. But then the next step, asking “is this model actually any good AT ALL,” seems to be avoided always.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@themattsimpson Why “of course”? (And why absent? Taken for granted?)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@themattsimpson I’m afraid I have some Austrian tendencies
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@themattsimpson That is very good to hear! (Empirical, I mean.) Think I read Cowen (?) saying that recently also
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
“A bridge to meta-rationality vs. civilizational collapse.”