@Meaningness @simplic10 except that doesn't really solve anything :) just repackages problems of reference as a species of induction problem
-
-
@Meaningness hadn't even heard of Jaynes until now tbh -
@schakalsynthetc It’s rubbish; you haven’t missed anything. But it’s religiously inspiring to people who don’t know the relevant math. - 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@schakalsynthetc I debunked the central technical confusion of the book in http://meaningness.com/probability-and-logic … . -
@schakalsynthetc Supposedly I’m going to explain why it inspires fucked-up religions in http://meaningness.com/bayesian-eternalism … but may never get around to.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.