@Meaningness @simplic10 well, hm, I guess it is *possible* consider "acts of naming" as observable events, but, uh ...
-
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@simplic10 except that doesn't really solve anything :) just repackages problems of reference as a species of induction problem2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @schakalsynthetc
@schakalsynthetc@simplic10 I’ve lost track of the levels of irony here. TBC, I am in general a pretty harsh critic of Bayesianism.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@simplic10 ah, ok. I never had track in the first place :) ftr my rule is, if I'm unsure, I default to answering unironically1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @schakalsynthetc
@schakalsynthetc@simplic10 Oh, sorry, OK! Other pieces critiquing Bayes more seriously: http://meaningness.com/metablog/how-to-think … andhttp://meaningness.com/probability-and-logic …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@simplic10 tbh I haven't encountered enough pop bayesanism to even realize that was yr target here. it seems ... silly.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @schakalsynthetc
@schakalsynthetc@simplic10 Oh. It’s a delusion that affected much of the twitter crowd we run in, for a while. LessWrong, you know.2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@simplic10 hm. sounds like what happened is a bunch of ppl suddenly grasped the concept of defeasible reasoning all at once >1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @schakalsynthetc
@Meaningness@simplic10 < & rightly got excited about it but got the wrong notion that d.r. equals "computing Bayesian expectations"1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@schakalsynthetc “Defeasible reasoning” is way beyond where they were at.
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@schakalsynthetc One self-educated kid, Eliezer Yudkowski, read a deeply confused, messianic book about Bayes (by E. T. Jaynes) >1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness
@schakalsynthetc > and started a sort of cult. He was not the first to do this; that book has been inspiring confused cults for 30 years.2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes - 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.