So, what has gone wrong in all these claims? Other than #1, factual falsity is not the problem, and there are no errors of logic.
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
Each argument is totally valid in other cases—just not about Washington being the first President. But they are wrong ways of thinking here.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness hm, are you tacitly supposing that there is a single, “right”, unambiguous method for determining the validity of analyses?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness arguments over the applicability of systems (at stage 5) look like arguments over their validity (at stage 4)1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@joXn [you meaning not you personally, but the generic ‘you’]
5:50 PM - 24 Apr 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.