@TristanSevers Yeah, that was basically invented in the mid-1970s, and popularized by Chuck Colson, who was one of the nastiest of Nixon’s >
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@TristanSevers > gang of thugs. It’s basically “Enlightenment experience” for Christians.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness
@TristanSevers Nothing occupied that place because real religions don’t have that nonsense. They are about conduct, not experience.2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness ...and you again remind me that the past is an alien world.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TristanSevers
@TristanSevers Speaking of which:pic.twitter.com/cKSmOK1aMY
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness Would be interesting to trace vs. GOPe family allegiances: how much membership shift vs. same guys solving for X votes?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TristanSevers
@TristanSevers Some of both, but the GOP deliberately pivoted in 60/70s to pull socially conservative Southern Democrats away, successfully.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness Am aware, hence the question specifically addressing elite vs. prole membership.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TristanSevers
@TristanSevers I am going to argue that the “countercultural era” (60s-80s) “rotated politics 90 degrees clockwise”; previously, the1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness
@TristanSevers Republicans were the elite and the Democrats the masses; after rotation, it was religious conservatives vs liberals.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@TristanSevers This is probably a vast oversimplification.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.