@maradydd >inducted into systematic institutions (employment, the military, or a university) which instilled a systematic ethics.
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@maradydd Unfortunately, the pomo revolution means that universities no longer do that; and increasingly employers are also accommodating >1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness
@maradydd > communal ethics rather than instilling professional ethics. I’m starting to worry this will lead to the end of civilization :-)2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@maradydd There’s powerful institutional incentives to maintain pomo in universities; it’s hard to see a way to reverse that.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness powerful, yes, but also fully self-contained and fully self-supporting, which has its own precariousness1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @maradydd
@Meaningness actually@freddiedeboer has gotten into this a bit in his critique of what rhetoric in the academy has (d)evolved into2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @maradydd
@Meaningness i.e., define yourself entirely in terms of things other fields yield better results on, and you may just define yourself away1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@maradydd > a pomo degree is pragmatically useless, and people that have them are finding employment >1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@maradydd > as social critics within productive institutions.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@maradydd > But since that’s parasitic, the number of such employment opportunities can’t be large enough to support the graduating pipeline
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.