@Meaningness Are there extrinsic mechanisms other than shame for transiting one Kohlberg stage to another? There must be something.
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@maradydd >inducted into systematic institutions (employment, the military, or a university) which instilled a systematic ethics.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness
@maradydd Unfortunately, the pomo revolution means that universities no longer do that; and increasingly employers are also accommodating >1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness
@maradydd > communal ethics rather than instilling professional ethics. I’m starting to worry this will lead to the end of civilization :-)2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@maradydd There’s powerful institutional incentives to maintain pomo in universities; it’s hard to see a way to reverse that.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@maradydd Also, some of the underlying pomo critique of systematicity is actually right (although few people understand this properly).1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@maradydd The high road is to try to create a clear path to Stage 5 that incorporates the accurate insights of pomo, but also affirms the >2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@maradydd > pragmatic value of systematicity. Currently, I see that as my mission in life :-) but it’s probably unrealistic.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.