“Final Statement on the LambdaConf Controversy: focus on professional ethics instead of morality” by @jdegoes http://degoes.net/articles/lambdaconf-conclusion …
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
A cogent defense of a Stage 4 ethics. Could argue against it in favor of a different Stage 4, or from a Stage 5 view; I haven’t seen either.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness How useful would that be for people at Stage 3? This (final statement) looks as much like an education tool as a defence to me…2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Black__Dwarf
@Meaningness It will be read by the conf opponents. Maybe a stage 5 defence would be less useful and more open to misunderstanding?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Black__Dwarf
@Black__Dwarf A stage 5 analysis would only be useful for those who are at stage 4.5, roughly speaking! So not relevant to the controversy,1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Black__Dwarf only to educating people about how stage 5 works.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Black__Dwarf nb also I said “a critique” meaning an argument AGAINST the@lambda_conf decision, even though I agree with it—to model what >1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Black__Dwarf > its opponents could/should have done better.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness Yes…I picked up on that. Was wondering how it would be useful - but I see now, you meant a kind of steel manning?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Black__Dwarf
@Black__Dwarf I was actually just thinking of using the controversy as a random example to teach ethics to people who aren’t involved. But,2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@Black__Dwarf yes, for those who have been involved in opposing @lambda_conf , seeing a steelman version of their concerns might be useful.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.