Striking in @lambda_conf controversy is communal/emotive (stage 3) vs systematic/principled (4) ethical frameworks: https://meaningness.wordpress.com/2015/10/12/developing-ethical-social-and-cognitive-competence/ …
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness Also get some sense of Stage 4 communists-in-Spanish-civil-war strategizing, where rules can be violated in the short term...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @marick
@Meaningness ... justified by long-term goals. Surely the early Soviet Union was Systematic!2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @marick
@Meaningness I could also see arguments for Stage V thinking, in which people most comfortable (as you've declared yourself to be) ...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @marick
@Meaningness ... with one kind of system of procedural justice are opting to adopt a second system.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @marick
@Meaningness That is, the situation - and people disagreeing with your conclusion - are perhaps more *ahem* Fluid than you credit.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@marick However, I have not actually come across anyone arguing for excluding Yarvin in stage 4 or 5 terms. Have you?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@marick It’s quite tempting to make those arguments myself! as an exercise, and demonstration of how the stages work.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.