@Meaningness what do you call the position that meaning is real, but socially (rather than individually) constructed?
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness yes, problem is that people think they know what "real" means. I half believe the pragmatic answer http://humancond.org/analysis/philosophy/reality …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @robamacl
@robamacl Yes… somewhat along the same line: http://meaningness.com/metablog/against-really …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness "socially constructed", as usually understood, sits uneasily with "real", esp in the sense of "having to deal with".1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness AFAIK, social construction usually taken to mean totally arbitrary, could be any way we want. No need to "deal with"3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @robamacl
@Meaningness one critique of pragmatic reality is that reality would change w/ social context. Implicit eternalism wrt reality, no?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness if X is nebulous, then I guess it's not going to yield to armchair inquiry. What else? Unask the question?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.