Go is not the sort of thing humans evolved to do, and we are bad at it. No one should be surprised a program is better at a logic puzzle.
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness what would surprise you? what wouldn't surprise you but seems like and would impress you?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fire__exit
@nairalos
@Meaningness FWIW I think it's impressive in the sense that no one expected it that soon.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@bara @nairalos > in computer time and salaries that Google did, if they wanted to make progress in AI rather than a publicity stunt!2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness @nairalos Task may be pointless (toy problem I called it) but techniques may have broad applicability, just not for AI.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness @nairalos The innovation is in the engineering, not the pure research side. :) And that kinda explains what Google gains.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.