Bad science used in attempted demonstration that science is mostly bad. Aaargh. http://projects.iq.harvard.edu/files/psychology-replications/files/gilbert_king_pettigrew_wilson_2016_with_appendix.pdf?m=1456973260 …
@Br1noCoelho < @social_brains
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness Over/under on that letter being bad?2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness
@St_Rev Problems include the professionalization of science, the pc-ization of any study of people, but mainly failure to teach/understand >1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@St_Rev > the meta-scientific issues—not of narrow methodology, but of how science actually works and how to do it well1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@St_Rev I've been following this closely, and come down on the "crisis" side. http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0149794 …1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @robamacl
@Meaningness@St_Rev social psych evolved a culture of under powered experiments as engine for false positive results. Performance art...1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @robamacl
@robamacl@Meaningness Interesting to see if they're converging on optimum (study time/expense) x (likelihood of publishable result)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@robamacl@Meaningness er likelihood/expense I guess. collusion to accept norms that push up publishability & push down expense2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@St_Rev the power of cultural evolution is that a whole field can do this unintentionally.0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.