...yet. You can't make the AI that replaces doctors until you have a system with legal access to medical infohttps://twitter.com/lukeprog/status/702692807069167616 …
-
-
Replying to @The_Lagrangian
@The_Lagrangian Not sure I understand… the diagnostic app gets the same info an AI one could/would?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness yes, but they want to have the infrastructure in place before making something that would too radically change healthcare1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @The_Lagrangian
@The_Lagrangian Still not following you. The app is a black box to doctors either way. Whether it’s a NN or decision tree, same issues.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness they can't test whether it would actually work without a proper training set, and wouldn't want to gamble product on that (?)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @The_Lagrangian
@The_Lagrangian Anything is possible. But as described, they don’t get any outcome data.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@The_Lagrangian And I would assume that getting clinical data to train on is not all that hard.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@The_Lagrangian And the announced app is presumably based on clinical data, which they could presumably get access to.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.