How the web “works” in 2016. http://xkcd.com/1636/
-
-
@Meaningness There's always Urbit... http://urbit.org/docs/theory/whitepaper … -
@othercriteria High ratio of interesting ideas to likely adoption, I fear. But, yes!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@Meaningness only comprehensive answer is IPv4 via NAT; still!! -
@redpillchange TCP is sort of OK. From there up… not so much! - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@Meaningness Elmlang is the closest thing I've seen. Not there yet though. -
@ctbeiser Haven’t heard of that, and couldn’t easily find it with google. URL handy? - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@Meaningness Nope, don't think so. We're not bad at patching the leaks and keeping things running. The Black Swans scare me more.@keithb_bThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.