Semi-skeptical discussion of the Google Go-playing paper: https://medium.com/backchannel/has-deepmind-really-passed-go-adc85e256bec#.lar62he8k … (HT @concutere & others)
Only question is whether the AlphaGo “neural” network did any non-obvious generalization. I don’t have access to the journal article, but >
-
-
> nothing I have read suggests it did. Generally, when analyzing “neural” learning results, I’ve found they didn’t do anything interesting.
- 21 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@Meaningness https://web.archive.org/web/20160128151110/https://storage.googleapis.com/deepmind-data/assets/papers/deepmind-mastering-go.pdf … but tbqh I wasn't too impressed with "look! you can mapreduce with hybrid [sup|unsup]ervised systems!" -
@maradydd Thank you very much indeed! Will read (in copious spare time :-) - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.