@Meaningness @TristanSevers turned it into a bureaucratic paper-production industry rather than discovery
-
-
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing@Meaningness@TristanSevers Science and Business are usually properly manifested by Amateurs1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @soapjackal
@soapjackal@sarahdoingthing@TristanSevers Ideally, yes, but some things need massive funding and/or large teams; and there are not a lot >2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@sarahdoingthing@TristanSevers are those things really that important? Or can they wait2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @soapjackal
@soapjackal@sarahdoingthing@TristanSevers HGP was probably worth doing; shuttle/Station and LHC probably not. IMO.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@sarahdoingthing@TristanSevers its not self evident such projects are useful from a 'keeping science true' standpoint1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @soapjackal
@soapjackal@sarahdoingthing@TristanSevers Well, HGP was useful from a “developing technology” and “finding facts” standpoint, although >3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness was thinking about DNA re: your comments on Newtonian vs. real physics1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@Meaningness a tidy solution that explains some stuff but reality turns out to be chaos/more complicated2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing interesting analogy! yeah, gene regulation turns out to be absurd1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.