@ArtirKel https://meaningness.wordpress.com/2015/11/27/emptiness-form-and-dzogchen-ethics/ … is the closest I’ve completed, but it’s extremely abstract, and from a particular Buddhist POV
@ArtirKel Well, trolley problems are dissimilar to most/all of the ethical issues we face in daily life. So my answer is: who cares?
-
-
@Meaningness Then our real-world understanding of the problem would be better, and we could see a proper answer.(?) -
@ArtirKel Yes; also, it’s a social process. Not just that as individuals we’d find it easier to see; we’d develop precedents, laws, etc. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@Meaningness But it could happen! (And probably something similar has happened at least once) The point is: It's a weird caseThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Meaningness , but it should be answerable using the same tools (or mindset, rather) we use for other ethical decisions.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Meaningness One answer: Maybe the easiness to see the solution is directly proportional to the actual relevance of the case.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Meaningness Hence little debate for wrongness of murder, theft, etc, lots for trolleys. If there were more random trolleys amokThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.