Given a choice between letting go of ethical foundations and absurd metaphysics, for many people absurdity seems preferable.
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
The central point of http://meaningness.com/ is that we have other choices—once we recognize that ethics works fine without foundations.
1 reply 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness Given that the ethics section is fully WIP, what should I read to grasp your points here?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@ArtirKel https://meaningness.wordpress.com/2015/11/27/emptiness-form-and-dzogchen-ethics/ … is the closest I’ve completed, but it’s extremely abstract, and from a particular Buddhist POV1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness Given that I also wanted to find out more about this Dzgochen you talk so well of, it's fine :)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness As a meta-meta-comment, the whole way you structured your blog is really interesting. Allows both comment on the 'book' itself1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness I was even planning on culturally appropiating it for a guide to good thinking that I planned to write!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness "That-which-is-meta-to-systems is not itself another system."<-I was being drawn to that from several povs,now there's one more2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes - 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.