@davidmanheim True; but I think that @willbuckingham ’s point (which I agree with) is that the criteria and processes are dysfunctional.
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@davidmanheim Not *wholly* dysfunctional. But I'm interested by the possibilities of thought/action such contexts exclude.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @willbuckingham
@willbuckingham@davidmanheim Yes… as an ex-academic independent intellectual, I have freedoms to speak and think academics don’t. However,1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness
@willbuckingham@davidmanheim > it’s difficult to know who I think and speak *for*, consideration of which is a large overhead; >1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@willbuckingham@davidmanheim > it’s not clear who my peer group is (who can help evaluate what I say).1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness
@willbuckingham@davidmanheim And my ability to self-fund is not guaranteed; and some of the people I would most want as peers have none.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness
@willbuckingham@davidmanheim And since I’m not interested in academic publishing, and there are no conferences/workships in my “field,” >1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@willbuckingham@davidmanheim > how best to share ideas and feel part of a thinking community? Twitter helps, but is far from ideal.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness Email discussion groups were a rich medium of intellectual exchange for me, especially in the '90s. But that was then.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@kaleidic There’s pluses and minuses to the open nature of twitter. Unexpected productive interactions with strangers; lack of focus/trust.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.