@Meaningness Your discussion of the systematic structure of Shambhala training put me in mind of this: https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2015/10/14/adults-hate-affirmative-consent-laws-the-college-students-i-meet-love-them/ …
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness “Affirmative consent” seemed problematic in a tension-between-paradigms way, and your discussion of Kegan has helped clarify.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @joXn
@Meaningness I’ll risk arrogating consistent level4+ thinking to myself —1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @joXn
@Meaningness Critiques aimed at downlevel principles have the form “okay, great! but then …” while going the other way — much more visceral.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @joXn
@Meaningness My college has been experimenting with “restorative justice” models for student life problems — it’s tough stuff!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @joXn
@Meaningness Possibly because restorative justice can be seen as aiming to provide satisfying level 3 *and* 4 resolutions to breaches.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @joXn
@Meaningness In terms of your discussion of support for transition from Lvl 3 to 4, though, it makes a lot of sense —1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @joXn
@Meaningness Restorative justice is *very* process heavy, but in the best case it can be seen & *felt* to work communally and systemically.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@joXn I hadn’t come across that term. Found http://restorativejustice.org/restorative-justice/ … . Thanks!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.