@Meaningness Groups must have norms however, or they don't cohere and bestow the advantages inherent in groups.
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness Beware: "Buddhist ethics" is just the ethics practised by Buddhists. There is no universal standard.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness But so what? If that is the ethic that American Buddhists adopt, then that is American Buddhist ethics. Isn't it?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Jayarava There’s a huge amount of effort being made to portray “Buddhist ethics” as something special; in particular, it’s >1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Jayarava > it’s the special sauce that Buddhism has that the secularists don’t, so you need to buy Buddhism™ brand mindfulness, not secular2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Jayarava “Buddhism = mindfulness + ethics” is the rallying cry. But since that ethics is just general American ethics, it’s hollow.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness In pāli the ethic is just general Indian. In Zen general Jap. In Tib Budh. just Tibetan1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @jonathanglick
@jonathanglick@Meaningness Actually I did respond. Keep up!2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes - 2 more replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.