David Chapman on Twitter: "@jonathanglick @Jayarava The locus classicus for the Buddhist side is http://t.co/geJZfqBGjI one of the most incoherent rambles I’ve ever"

Country	Code	For customers of
United States	40404	(any)
Canada	21212	(any)
United Kingdom	86444	Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
Brazil	40404	Nextel, TIM
Haiti	40404	Digicel, Voila
Ireland	51210	Vodafone, O2
India	53000	Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
Indonesia	89887	AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
Italy	4880804	Wind
3424486444	Vodafone
» See SMS short codes for other countries

David Chapman ‏@Meaningness 16 Sep 2015

I hoped that after taking a week off from the “ethics in mindfulness meditation” debate, it would all make sense. pic.twitter.com/YZpCTM2XQ8

5:19 PM - 16 Sep 2015 · Details
4 likes
Jayarava जयरव 勝鳴 ‏@Jayarava 18 Sep 2015

@Meaningness The primary importance of all systems of ethics is as a point of leverage to enforce group norms.
David Chapman ‏@Meaningness 18 Sep 2015

@Jayarava Yes… In the case of “Consensus Buddhism,” the norms are mainstream American leftish norms. This gets called “Buddhist ethics…”
David Chapman ‏@Meaningness 18 Sep 2015

@Jayarava I don’t have much quarrel with the norms, but the pretense that they are Buddhist rubs me the wrong way.
Jonathan Glick ‏@jonathanglick 18 Sep 2015

@Meaningness @Jayarava (not to interrupt - but is there specific ‘secularist’ text or texts you guys are critiquing?)
David Chapman ‏@Meaningness 18 Sep 2015

@jonathanglick @Jayarava I’m actually critiquing a critique of the secularists (but not defending the secularists). Plague on both houses!
David Chapman ‏@Meaningness 18 Sep 2015

@jonathanglick @Jayarava http://www.existentialbuddhist.com/2013/12/in-defense-of-mindfulness/ … is a fairly decent statement of the secularist side of the argument
1 like

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.