@joXn Yeah, I’m vaguely aware of it, but it seems pretty much off-topic relative to the main point I was making
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness It’s the most successful physical theory yet, it can express relationships of necessity (of a sort) between different systems…>1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @joXn
@Meaningness And yet those relationships (entanglement) are highly technical, physically fragile, and nothing like Bayesian “reasoning”…>1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @joXn
@Meaningness But that aside, it weakens the piece to say nobody has found any useful extensions/generalizations to probability theory. …>2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @joXn
@Meaningness They have, but all it lead to is a refinement of logic on propositions, not anything more philosophically sweeping.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @joXn
@Meaningness And quantum mechanics is not some side eddy in the river of mathematical theory, like indeterminate probability is.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness My pleasure; thanks for writing the piece!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness I’ve never had to think about it! Would you be willing to go with, “John Costello (@joxn on Twitter)”?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.