@themattsimpson Thanks for prodding me! I’ve posted a rough draft at http://meaningness.com/metablog/probability-and-logic … cc: @st_rev @GabrielDuquette
-
-
@themattsimpson I think I’m probably just going to drop the footnote and its subject altogether, for now at least.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@themattsimpson I had in mind the possibility that you could take a parameterized *logical* model and invert it algorithmically to get a >
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@themattsimpson > statistical inference procedure for it. This seems like it would be really cool, but probably runs up against the same >
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@themattsimpson complexities that have so far made a general unification of logic and probability theory impossible. However, doing even >
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@themattsimpson special cases might be cool, and might cast some light on the foundations of statistical theory.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.