@senggedorje they were all happy and singing as they worked in the fields because they had Buddhism.
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@senggedorje if they didn’t like being slaves, they surely could have just run away, so either they weren’t really slaves, or they liked it1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@senggedorje some of the slaves were much better off than others, almost as rich as free people, which proves it wasn’t slavery.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@senggedorje it wouldn’t have been in the slave owners’ economic interest to mistreat their slaves, therefore they didn’t, so slavery was OK1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness are these arguments put forward by Buddhists or antebellum Alabamans?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @senggedorje
@senggedorje yeah, the similarity is striking!
9:05 AM - 19 Aug 2015
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.