In its 20 years, the Journal of Buddhist Ethics has only one paper discussing Kohlberg’s theory of moral development: http://blogs.dickinson.edu/buddhistethics/files/2010/12/Trinlae-Mulasarvastavadin-Bhikshuni.pdf …
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
Presumably this is because “Buddhist ethics” is obviously juvenile when evaluated according to Kohlberg’s system.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness or that once it does, it often ceases to be related to as uniquely "Buddhist", or "by Buddhists"?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @shinenigan
@shinenigan There’s recent attempts to create a more sophisticated “Buddhist ethics” than anything in the tradition. Not clear it’s Buddhist2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness My sense is that "tradition" is partially invented in order to freeze ethical dvlpmnt in the "niceness" of earlier stages2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness thank u for clarifying. Love yr writing!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@shinenigan Thank you! Working on a long series on Buddhist ethics now; not sure when/whether I will finish.
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness I look fwd to reading that! I've particularly enjoyed yr gigantic chart. Yr description of "Buddhism" under "Fluidity" is Gold!0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.