Query to anyone who knows the suttas well: The Sigalovada says the highest duty of layman is to support "ascetics and brahmins." Anomalous?
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
Isn't it odd for a Buddhist text to recommend supporting brahmins, rather than monks? Or is "ascetics" actually "bhikkhus"?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
It's interesting that many of the summaries I read on the web do replace "ascetics and brahmins" with "monks" (inaccurately, I take it?).
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
Based on this and other inconsistencies, I suspect the Sigalovada is a brahmanical text, lightly edited, and slipped into the suttapitaka.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
But I don't read Pali and I don't know the suttas at all well, so maybe this suspicion is obviously wrong?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
The Sigalovada Sutta is a key text for "Buddhist ethics," so if it's actually brahmanical, some rethinking might be called for.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness brahmins basically pwned the sangha in the first 100 years after B's death. Basic Indian history fact on 8th grade tests2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.