A powerful agent/system *caring what you think* is prima facie worrisome. Maybe they are looking for write access, not read access.
-
-
Replying to @simplic10
@simplic10 the word "you" here is problematic. most people are terrible at thinking; if their thoughts are overwritten, it's no great loss.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GapOfGods
@GapOfGods Pretty sure a pwned idiot is scarier than a vanilla idiot.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @simplic10
@simplic10@GapOfGods ooo! Political movements as botnets1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@simplic10@GapOfGods <whispers> e g r e g o r e s1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@St_Rev@GapOfGods although an egregore is an autonomous discourse (as in Foucault) whereas@simplic10 OT suggested human controller(s)…2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@GapOfGods@simplic10 That Clark Routledge lecture! Human controllers touch the memeplexes lightly, lightly...2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @St_Rev
@St_Rev@GapOfGods@simplic10 do we think any are skilled enough to do that? (Unsure)1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@St_Rev @GapOfGods @simplic10 I wonder, as I suspect you do, who if any are the shadowy controllers of the pc entryist botnet
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@GapOfGods@simplic10 An*l D*sh is one.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.