Odd: web folk often see me as authority on Buddhism, despite disclaimers; no one takes seriously what I say about AI, despite credentials.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @wanderingtree
@wanderingtree That’s plausible! Although there’s a new AI hype cycle going—don’t know if you’ve observed that1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @wanderingtree
@wanderingtree “deep learning” is the most substantive thing. It’s 1987 backprop connectionism but Moore’s Law makes it actually work smtims1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@wanderingtree seemingly works well enough that I’m tempted to dig into details. I suspect there’s a lot of trickery and overinterpretation1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@wanderingtree as there was in 1987. But this time it may be partly real.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@wanderingtree besides that there’s the self-driving cars, which are probably not interesting at all but I don’t know details.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@wanderingtree plus various idiotic stunts like IBM’s Watson and junk like that which have no substance at all.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.