Odd: web folk often see me as authority on Buddhism, despite disclaimers; no one takes seriously what I say about AI, despite credentials.
-
-
And maybe a few mass-audience books, but rarely even an undergraduate textbook. Why is this?
-
No one feels entitled to opinion about biochemistry or rocket engineering or paleontology, even though those are exciting and controversial!
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@Meaningness I only know what I learned from the first edition of Winston's AI textbook & a John Pollock course on philosophy of AI. -
@lippard That’s more than most, for sure!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@Meaningness@pmarca the weird thing is that people actually entitled to an opinion on AI are still just goofy irrational about itThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Meaningness But AI is *way* harder than economics. Trust me.@pmarca -
@michelteivel@Meaningness@pmarca that should quiet all of our fears about ever inventing strong AI then...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@Meaningness@fnxTX AI cares not for obsolete conceptual frameworks. individual opinions are futile.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Meaningness@pmarca I like to base my a.i. opinions on sci-fi movies. Probably just as accurateThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Meaningness: I get all my AI opinions via@pmarca tweetstorms.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.