@joXn @Meaningness But this is drifting away, or diffusing, from the critical points he's making. The language of chaos theory...
-
-
Replying to @St_Rev
@joXn@Meaningness ...disappoints--25 years later. Well, we were all fooled like that at the time. I sure was.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@St_Rev@Meaningness Yeah, this is why I thought that the one weakness was the chaos reference, which wasn’t really necessary.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @joXn
@St_Rev@Meaningness A friend of mine called this a “catalogy” — a correspondence between two concepts leaving you more confused about both.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness Websearch on Agre gives this http://cobb.typepad.com/cobb/2012/05/how-phil-agre-is-wrong-about-conservatism.html … and a bunch of stuff about him going missing2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness What work of his would you point to as interesting/useful1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@St_Rev Most of what we wrote then was addressed to AI-as-it-was, which is now of zero interest, and pretty opaque.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@St_Rev This is probably accessible and might be to your taste: https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/6487/AIM-1050A.pdf?sequence=2 …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.