@Meaningness In the sense that dynamical chaos opens the possibility that “randomness” can be the product of simple deterministic processes?
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@joXn Since the way this works is difficult to understand, it’s unfortunately a wonderful all-purpose justification for woo1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness
@joXn now that I think about it, I wonder why it didn’t completely replace quantum woo… maybe not different enough at the lay level2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@joXn The minimal insights (eg sensitive dependence on initial conditions, attractors) aren't quite as accessible/distortable.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@Meaningness In re Bey, the specific “swirl of smoke in air” example is poorly chosen, which made me suspect him of woo.@St_Rev1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @joXn1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@St_Rev “Why doesn’t a swirl of smoke dissipate like a mathematical gas?” …>2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @joXn
@Meaningness@St_Rev Because a mathematical gas’s behavior is definitionally modeled by the stupid-simple diffusion equation.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @joXn1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@St_Rev Turbulence … certainly seems random. COULD it be dynamical chaos? Mmmmaybe? It’s not understood.0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.