@Jayarava Inasmuch as religion can be explained at all, it’s in terms of many disparate things. If that’s reduction, so is all explanation,
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness 1 emphasises components, the other context. Possible to combine both of course.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Jayarava Also there’s no objectively-separable “parts” or “wholes,” so neither can work as a foundational program anyway.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness it's only you that is concerned with or taking about " foundational programs". I don't see relevance.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness yes, but how is that relevant to *this* discussion?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Jayarava so you are saying “coherent but not foundational”?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness of course. I have no interest in "foundational".2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.