Guess rule behind this sequence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5...? You can ask me whether 3 other sequences fit the rule too. (shh if you've seen this)
-
-
Replying to @vgr
@vgr In an (unfinished) essay for Less Wrong,@meaningness wrote the would-be-definitive-if-he-finished-it discussion of this problem.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @Meaningness1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
-
Replying to @St_Rev
@St_Rev@Meaningness solomonoff induction something something ewoks?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @vgr1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@St_Rev ooh, "search your feelings, Luke"?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @vgr
@vgr @St_Rev Barf to that too. Actually the story starts by explicitly rejecting both of those: http://meaningness.com/rationalist-eternalism …
10:24 PM - 2 Jul 2015
0 replies
0 retweets
2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.