@Buddhistethics As I said, it would take 10,000 words to make it seem plausible to American Buddhists. (I think I could… maybe not!)
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Buddhistethics (That is, to make my analysis seem plausible—I don’t know or care much about Zizek’s.)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@Buddhistethics : Interesing discussion!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BuddhistGeeks
@BuddhistGeeks@Buddhistethics Thanks! Wish I were the sort of person who could spend three hours writing up a ranty blog post about this.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@BuddhistGeeks@Buddhistethics I would spend three weeks doing background reading and thinking through all angles, then write the same rant.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@BuddhistGeeks@Buddhistethics I actually started on that and read three authoritative books on Buddhist Ethics and many issues of the JBE…1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@BuddhistGeeks@Buddhistethics which confirmed that there is no such thing. However, writing that up so I’m sure it’s watertight—slow job.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@BuddhistGeeks Yea, that sounds like a tricky task, disproving the existence of an object of study so many have worked on.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BuddhistEthics
@Buddhistethics@BuddhistGeeks Well, Damien Keown explicitly agrees, and he pretty much founded the field…1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@BuddhistGeeks ahhh; no, he argues that there are no explicit treatises on B ethics, but 'it' still exists...2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes
@Buddhistethics @BuddhistGeeks Hmm. Have you read his piece in McMahan’s collection “Buddhism in the Modern World”? Wasn’t my reading of him
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.