@Buddhistethics > and is indistinguishable from current leftish American ethics. Is there any point in which they disagree?
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness oh, it depends on *which* Buddhist ethics and which lefty ethics you compare; the importance of renunciation comes to mind.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BuddhistEthics
@Buddhistethics If I’m typical secular American lefty and convert to American Buddhism, do I have to change any significant ethical stances?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness As I said, it depends on *which* version of each you choose. One could cherry pick to find no need for change if wanted.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BuddhistEthics
@Buddhistethics Agreed! Those arguing for “mindfulness without ethics is a problem” mostly advocate secular American ethics, tho, right?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness No; most I've seen arguing for more ethics in mindfulness are drawing from Asian/traditional Buddhist sources.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BuddhistEthics
@Buddhistethics Do they argue for ethical positions that would be unacceptable to secular American lefties?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness Um, well some secular Am. lefties maybe; others no. I'm not sure :)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BuddhistEthics
@Buddhistethics Hmm. Could you give concrete examples of ethical positions they’d support that many Americans would reject?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness Bhikkhu Bodhi's analysis of the Kalama sutta - it's not the 'hippy-ish' do as you please teaching as many want it to be.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@Buddhistethics Yes, that’s a brilliant article! I often recommend it for that reason. However, I don’t see it advocating unacceptable >
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.