@sarahdoingthing @St_Rev I think these negotiating examples may b valid. Inasmuch as negotiating sex is the feminist issue, could b relevant
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@St_Rev negotiating examples are the best, just including the theory sum-up that follows the tutoring example1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing@St_Rev So is “anti-choice feminism” an actual thing I can read about somewhere?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness I *think*@St_Rev was characterizing this kind of thing http://theconversation.com/no-feminism-is-not-about-choice-40896 …3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing@Meaningness Yes, tweet was reacting specifically to that article, but I've encountered the line of attack before.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @St_Rev
@St_Rev@sarahdoingthing It’s easy to see that *some* (maybe even most) women would benefit by restricting some other women’s choices…1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@St_Rev@sarahdoingthing It’s technically interesting to see whether they have an argument that *all* women could be so benefitted.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@sarahdoingthing arguing in terms of collectives reifies--and disappears--the well-being of actually-existing women2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @St_Rev
@Meaningness@sarahdoingthing but there's a bait-and-switch: just imagine how nice it would be if you were on top of the pecking order! ...1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @St_Rev
@Meaningness@sarahdoingthing well, when we defeat patriarchy, ALL women will be on top of the pecking order! like a string with one end.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@St_Rev @sarahdoingthing Everyone’s income will be above average, and no one will be in the evil 1%
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.