The point of anti-choice feminism seems pretty clear: if choices are of no value, taking them away is no harm. Obvious implications.
-
-
Replying to @St_Rev
@St_Rev a choice can often be a harm (J. David Velleman) http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/philosophy/undergraduate/modules/ph137/2014-15/velleman_-_against_the_right_to_die.pdf …pic.twitter.com/nBqhuR6E44
3 replies 2 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@St_Rev another good sectionpic.twitter.com/y4WDqoyvEm
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@St_Rev canonical example is the night cashier at a liquor storepic.twitter.com/uowADJ9XIR
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing@St_Rev I think these negotiating examples may b valid. Inasmuch as negotiating sex is the feminist issue, could b relevant1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@St_Rev negotiating examples are the best, just including the theory sum-up that follows the tutoring example1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing@St_Rev So is “anti-choice feminism” an actual thing I can read about somewhere?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness I *think*@St_Rev was characterizing this kind of thing http://theconversation.com/no-feminism-is-not-about-choice-40896 …3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@sarahdoingthing @St_Rev Teasing apart everything wrong with that would be quite complicated, and better not done in public…
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.