The point of anti-choice feminism seems pretty clear: if choices are of no value, taking them away is no harm. Obvious implications.
-
-
Replying to @St_Rev
@St_Rev a choice can often be a harm (J. David Velleman) http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/philosophy/undergraduate/modules/ph137/2014-15/velleman_-_against_the_right_to_die.pdf …pic.twitter.com/nBqhuR6E44
3 replies 2 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@St_Rev another good sectionpic.twitter.com/y4WDqoyvEm
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing @St_Rev Another non-example. The harm is done by additional information conveyed with the choice, not by having new option.
7:28 AM - 4 May 2015
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.