@The_Rams_Fog I actually don’t know. I think probably the former, but I don’t want to make any strong claims there.
-
-
-
@The_Rams_Fog I’m not doing science or philosophy, so I don’t have to address questions like that. My attitude is practical: >
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@The_Rams_Fog I don’t know Kant except from secondary sources. I plan to say something in passing about the Critique in a discussion of >
-
@The_Rams_Fog > the breakdown of certainty during the 20th century; but it’s not a response to it or anything like that.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@The_Rams_Fog Alas, yes. I like “fissiparous entelechy” but if one writes like that, no one is going to read it…
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@The_Rams_Fog I’m sorry, I have a newish policy of not answering emails about it—I was spending more time doing that than writing it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@The_Rams_Fog If you post a comment I may well answer (but can’t promise—that also can take time away from writing).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@The_Rams_Fog The book is going WAY too slowly, cuz I don’t get much time to write, so I have to prioritize. Hope you understand.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@The_Rams_Fog How might it be misused?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@The_Rams_Fog Oh, I see the relevance of Kant now. Yes, well, there aren’t any foundations; but we can build anyway. Central point.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.