Like @vgr in that essay, I don’t believe in “authenticity.” INauthenticity—duplicity—is a thing for sure. Opposite is not “authenticity” tho
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@vgr INauthenticity is just the absence of something. By your logic we don't need a word for it.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@vgr I suspect Twitter is not the forum for an argument over whether there is or is not such a thing as authentic.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Jayarava2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@vgr Which suggests that Twitter is not authentic, or not conducive to authenticity. :-)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @Jayarava
@Jayarava @vgr It certainly is not conducive to “sincerity” in the sense of Seligman et al. (https://meaningness.wordpress.com/2015/04/04/ritual-vs-mentalism/ …).
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.