Like @vgr in that essay, I don’t believe in “authenticity.” INauthenticity—duplicity—is a thing for sure. Opposite is not “authenticity” tho
@vgr This is the point that is hardest to get across to (e.g) cognitive scientists. I spent years doing that, in the late 1980s… Some got it
-
-
@vgr Most are unwilling to admit that there are possibilities other than woo and individualist reductionism.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Meaningness It's hard to get across not because the social-as-primitive way actually has problems, not because people are being obstinate -
@vgr That was certainly my impression at the time! I worried I might have been being uncharitable, though :-)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.