Like @vgr in that essay, I don’t believe in “authenticity.” INauthenticity—duplicity—is a thing for sure. Opposite is not “authenticity” tho
-
-
@Meaningness Certainly. My point is, you don't need mysticism to account for how meaning is constructed socially. -
@vgr On the other hand, I think meaning is a social thing *from the start*, not an coordination of individual mind-stuff. - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
.
@vgr From an individualist point of view, it’s difficult not to hear that as “mental fluid slopping out of brains” which isn’t the point… - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.