Like @vgr in that essay, I don’t believe in “authenticity.” INauthenticity—duplicity—is a thing for sure. Opposite is not “authenticity” tho
-
-
@Meaningness And that point of the thing is? (I assume you mean whatever X I've reified as 'cultural ether') -
@vgr Well, I don’t think there’s a thing that corresponds to that, exactly… However, - 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
He gives basically the standard scientistic-nihilist argument against Romanticism/monism/Idealism/essentialism, which is mostly right…
-
… but wrong in its individualism/reductionism/mentalism, and so in not seeing what’s right in Romanticism and social construction.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.