@Jayarava @bornwithatail_ @sarahdoingthing Plato’s point here is that the physical world as defective because it is changeable; I disagree
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@bornwithatail_@sarahdoingthing With which bit?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Jayarava
@Jayarava@bornwithatail_@sarahdoingthing Well, that’s his overall view. I think that’s what’s going on in “always becoming but never is”;1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Jayarava@bornwithatail_@sarahdoingthing ; however I haven’t read the context to be certain.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Jayarava@bornwithatail_@sarahdoingthing The Greeks were hung up on “existence” is a useless way, going back to Thales; distorts everythin2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Jayarava@bornwithatail_@sarahdoingthing IN a useless way I mean1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Jayarava@bornwithatail_@sarahdoingthing Thales had the idea that genuine existence precluded change (eternalism).1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Jayarava@bornwithatail_@sarahdoingthing Plato was trying to account for change by regarding the physical world as not-really-real, and1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Jayarava@bornwithatail_@sarahdoingthing mere “shadows” of the changeless Forms, which in turn reflected The One (monism). Ugh.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@bornwithatail_@sarahdoingthing Yes. Ugh. So back to talking about the nature of experience and epistemological limits?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@Jayarava @bornwithatail_ @sarahdoingthing Yeah, sorry for rant. Where were we? … my points are ontological, not epistemological…
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.