@hokaisobol Oh—Puett wasn’t arguing for rationality, he was explaining that Chinese philosophy has been systematically misunderstood >
-
-
-
@hokaisobol > by viewing it through Protestant assumptions, by which “level of rationalization” is a main axis of cultural difference. - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@hokaisobol Do you mean, why not let’s do this now? Or do you mean, why isn’t that the right way to understand Protestantism?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@hokaisobol I have read a little… Say more about what I should know?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@hokaisobol Can you say more about “reactionary more than reformist”? That’s not obvious…Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@hokaisobol Ah… thanks for the pointer! BTW, one of the many things I’m failing to write current is about the limits of rationality…Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@hokaisobol@meaningness Bertrand Russell discovered that Whitehead read in bed Paolo Sarpi on the Council of Trent https://philosophynow.org/issues/101/Paolo_Sarpi_1552-1623 …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.