@MikeAnissimov @sarahdoingthing Yup. And also, I think somewhere between 145 and 160 is where qualitative differences start dominating.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @MikeAnissimov
@MikeAnissimov@sarahdoingthing Ultimately, though, the question is: does it matter, and how? A number doesn’t; abilities do.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @MikeAnissimov
@MikeAnissimov@sarahdoingthing Yes, I’ve seen papers like that. Confirmed what I believed. My question is more “matters how” than “whether”1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @MikeAnissimov
@MikeAnissimov@sarahdoingthing This presupposes that g is an all-purpose zorch factor, which I believe out to 145, but maybe not above!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @MikeAnissimov
@MikeAnissimov@sarahdoingthing No! That’s why I was hoping you had got some good answers.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Replying to @MikeAnissimov
@MikeAnissimov @sarahdoingthing I’ve wondered whether this is too politically hot to get grant money for,
9:54 PM - 3 Mar 2015
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.