@sarahdoingthing moveable type enabled cult of author? but I don’t think there was an unconscious before Romantics
-
-
-
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing I meant no concept/theory of unconscious, so the idea that art came from there couldn’t exist.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness ah ok - I was thinking no separation, in Keith Johnstone's conception of the artist as bring forth from elsewhere2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing not expert on this, but think art came only from without until Rs.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness dammit why isn't there just one giant book explaining the history of consciousness1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing Charles Taylor’s _Sources of the Self_, probably. Does cover Romantics. But it’s 900pp and supposedly very hard going.2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing You are reading it now? I am half envious… I’m up to my ass in marsupial ice-tigers, no time for reading (much less writing1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness just started it - feel instantly at home in his language and framework (which word he drops immediately)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@sarahdoingthing Good! …He’s a Catholic, so yeah, some things will make sense to you that might not so easily to me :-)
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness he reads to me like a Catholic version of Jonathan Haidt1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing But his approach is historical, and Haidt's is not? Similar in other ways though?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.