@Meaningness WAT
-
-
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing I meant no concept/theory of unconscious, so the idea that art came from there couldn’t exist.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness ah ok - I was thinking no separation, in Keith Johnstone's conception of the artist as bring forth from elsewhere2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing not expert on this, but think art came only from without until Rs.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness dammit why isn't there just one giant book explaining the history of consciousness1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing Charles Taylor’s _Sources of the Self_, probably. Does cover Romantics. But it’s 900pp and supposedly very hard going.2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@sarahdoingthing I keep thinking “I really had better read that” and then I look again and say “only if I get a 900-year lifespan”1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing Probably better starting point: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romanticism#Defining_Romanticism …1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness
@sarahdoingthing For absence of similar ideas in previous periods, see Berlin quote in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romanticism#Context_and_place_in_history …1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes
@sarahdoingthing I think this is the source of a huge part of vintage-2015 popular understanding & experience of meaning; and mostly malign.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.