@GrumplessGrinch What Cox was actually trying to show is that there’s nothing “like” probability theory that isn’t. I mostly agree…
@GrumplessGrinch which is why finding that it’s a non-theorem is an unwanted complication.
-
-
@GrumplessGrinch On the other hand, brandishing it as proof of Bayes über alles when it isn’t even true seems really sketchy.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.